Monthly Archives: February 2017

//February

DWI & DUI Case Law MONTANO v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF PIMA, and L. SCHOLL and The STATE of Arizona – Supreme Court of Arizona

149 Ariz. 385 (1986)719 P.2d 271Jose Roberto MONTANO, Petitioner,v.SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF PIMA, and Honorable William L. Scholl, a Judge Pro Tempore thereof, Respondents, and The STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Stephen D. NEELY, County Attorney for the County of Pima, Real Party in Interest.No. 18186-PR.Supreme [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Arizona, DWI & DUI|0 Comments

DWI & DUI Case Law UNITED STATES v. Eric D. HORN – District Court of Maryland

185 F.Supp.2d 530 (2002)UNITED STATES,v.Eric D. HORN.No. CRIM A. 00-946-PWG.United States District Court, D. Maryland.January 31, 2002. Eric D. Horn, APG, MD, pro se.MEMORANDUM AND ORDERGRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.At approximately 10:35 p.m. on June 28, 2000, Sergeant Eric D. Horn attempted to enter the Harford Road gate of the Army facility located at Aberdeen [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|DWI & DUI, Maryland|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. FLORES et al.- Supreme Court of United States

507 U.S. 292 (1993)RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.v.FLORES et al.No. 91-905.United States Supreme Court.Argued October 13, 1992.Decided March 23, 1993.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, and Thomas, JJ., joined. O'Connor, J.,filed [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR et al.- Supreme Court of United States

133 S.Ct. 2675 (2013)UNITED STATES, Petitionerv.Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al.No. 12-307.Supreme Court of United States.Argued March 27, 2013.Decided June 26, 2013.22 Vicki C. Jackson, appointed by this Court, as amicus curiae, by Sri Srinivasan, for Petitioner.Paul D. Clement, for Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES v. RANDALL S.- Supreme Court of California

13 Cal.4th 196 (1996)In re CHANTAL S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent,v.RANDALL S., Defendant and Appellant.Docket No. S046778.Supreme Court of California.April 22, 1996. COUNSELThomas L. Hardy, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.William C. Katzenstein, County Counsel, and Jennifer Williams, [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|California, Family Law|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law EGELHOFF v. EGELHOFF, a minor, by and through her natural parent, BREINER, et al.- Supreme Court of United States

532 U.S. 141 (2001)EGELHOFFv.EGELHOFF, a minor, by and throughHER NATURAL PARENT, BREINER, et al.No. 99-1529.United States Supreme Court.Argued November 8, 2000.Decided March 21, 2001.CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law LASSITER v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA- Supreme Court of United States

452 U.S. 18 (1981)LASSITERv.DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.No. 79-6423.Supreme Court of United States.Argued February 23, 1981.Decided June 1, 1981.CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. Leowen Evans argued the cause pro hac vice for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Gregory C. Malhoit and Robert L. Walker.Thomas Russell [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law BODDIE et al. v. CONNECTICUT et al.- Supreme Court of United States

401 U.S. 371 (1971)BODDIE ET AL.v.CONNECTICUT ET AL.No. 27.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 8, 1969Reargued November 17, 1970Decided March 2, 1971APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT.Arthur B. LaFrance reargued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.Raymond J. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General of Connecticut, reargued the cause for appellees. [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. v. NEWDOW et al.- Supreme Court of United States

542 U.S. 1 (2004)ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL.v.NEWDOW ET AL.No. 02-1624.Supreme Court of United States.Argued March 24, 2004.Decided June 14, 2004.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KENNEDY, SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. REHNQUIST, C. J., filed [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law UNITED STATES v. YAZELL- Supreme Court of United States

382 U.S. 341 (1966)UNITED STATESv.YAZELL.No. 10.Supreme Court of United States.Argued October 13, 1965.Decided January 17, 1966.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were former Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Louis F. Claiborne, Sherman L. Cohn [...]

By | February 28th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments