Family Law

/Family Law

Family Law Case Law PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al. v. CASEY, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. – Supreme Court of United States

505 U.S. 833 (1992)PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al.v.CASEY, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al.No. 91-744.United States Supreme Court.Argued April 22, 1992.Decided June 29, 1992.[*]CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT O'Connor, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law M. L. B. v. S. L. J., individually and as next friend OF THE MINOR CHILDREN, S. L. J. and M. L. J., et ux. – Supreme Court of United States

519 U.S. 102 (1996)M. L. B.v.S. L. J., individually and as next friendOF THE MINOR CHILDREN, S. L. J. and M. L. J., et ux.No. 95-853.United States Supreme Court.Argued October 7, 1996.Decided December 16, 1996.CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, and [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law PRINCE v. MASSACHUSETTS – Supreme Court of United States

321 U.S. 158 (1944)PRINCEv.MASSACHUSETTS.No. 98.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 14, 1943.Decided January 31, 1944.APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, PLYMOUTH COUNTY. Mr. Hayden C. Covington, with whom Mr. Alfred A. Albert was on the brief, for appellant.Mr. Robert T. Bushnell, Attorney General of Massachusetts, for appellee.MR. JUSTICE RUTLEDGE delivered the opinion of the [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law PIERCE, GOVERNOR OF OREGON, et al. v. SOCIETY OF SISTERS. PIERCE, GOVERNOR OF OREGON, et al. v. HILL MILITARY ACADEMY – Supreme Court of United States

268 U.S. 510 (1925)PIERCE, GOVERNOR OF OREGON, ET AL.v.SOCIETY OF SISTERS.PIERCE, GOVERNOR OF OREGON, ET AL.v.HILL MILITARY ACADEMY.Nos. 583, 584.Supreme Court of United States.Argued March 16, 17, 1925.Decided June 1, 1925.APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Mr. Willis S. Moore, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, with whom [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law GRISWOLD et al. v. CONNECTICUT – Supreme Court of United States

381 U.S. 479 (1965)GRISWOLD ET AL.v.CONNECTICUT.No. 496.Supreme Court of United States.Argued March 29-30, 1965.Decided June 7, 1965.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.Thomas I. Emerson argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Catherine G. Roraback.Joseph B. Clark argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was Julius [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law MEYER v. STATE OF NEBRASKA – Supreme Court of United States

262 U.S. 390 (1923)MEYERv.STATE OF NEBRASKA.No. 325.Supreme Court of United States.Argued February 23, 1923.Decided June 4, 1923.ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. Mr. Charles E. Sandall, with whom Mr. I.L. Albert, Mr. Arthur G. Wray and Mr. August Wagner were on the briefs, for plaintiff in error.Mr. Mason Wheeler and Mr. [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law KULKO v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO – Supreme Court of United States

436 U.S. 84 (1978)KULKOv.SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (HORN, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST)No. 77-293.Supreme Court of the United States.Argued March 29, 1978.Decided May 15, 1978.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.86*86 Lawrence H. Stotter argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Edward [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law UNITED STATES v. MORRISON et al. – Supreme Court of United States

529 U.S. 598 (2000)UNITED STATESv.MORRISON et al.No. 99-5.United States Supreme Court.Argued January 11, 2000.Decided May 15, 2000.[*]CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 627. [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law ROE et al. v. WADE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DALLAS COUNTY – Supreme Court of United States

410 U.S. 113 (1973)ROE ET AL.v.WADE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DALLAS COUNTY.No. 70-18.Supreme Court of United States.Argued December 13, 1971.Reargued October 11, 1972.Decided January 22, 1973.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Sarah Weddington reargued the cause for appellants. With her on the briefs were Roy Lucas, Fred Bruner, Roy [...]

By | March 12th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments

Family Law Case Law ANKENBRANDT et al. v. RICHARDS et al. – Supreme Court of United States

504 U.S. 689 (1992)ANKENBRANDT, as next friend and mother of L. R., et al.v.RICHARDS et al.No. 91-367.United States Supreme Court.Argued March 31, 1992.Decided June 15, 1992.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT White, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and [...]

By | March 10th, 2017|Family Law, USA Supreme Court|0 Comments